‘Accident waiting to happen’ – concern at lack of pavement along busy Sheffield road

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
Pedestrians have found themselves having to cross a busy dual carriageway in Sheffield following the closure of a pavement running alongside the road. Outraged Star reader Simon Rawlins has written an open letter to complain.

“I wish to protest in strong terms at what I see as the high-handed treatment of pedestrians in a south-westerly direction, from Bridge Street’s junction with Derek Dooley Way, towards West Bar, and vice versa.

“Big, hefty warning signs, at least from the end closer to West Bar, announce: ‘Footpath closed’ and ‘Use footpath opposite’. This is across six lanes of traffic, three in each direction!

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“I think this shambolic situation is an accident waiting to happen, and see it as my duty, to warn other pedestrians, of this danger.

A pavement running alongside the busy A61 between  Derek Dooley Way and Shalesmoor has been blocked offA pavement running alongside the busy A61 between  Derek Dooley Way and Shalesmoor has been blocked off
A pavement running alongside the busy A61 between Derek Dooley Way and Shalesmoor has been blocked off

“Some 100 yards of pavement has been made out of bounds, outside a building site where Bowmer Kirkland is building a high-rise eyesore.

“Really high boarding separates the site from the pavement, yet it seems to be us pedestrians that have to make such a risky detour!

“By contrast, on Pond Street in the city centre, near the Penny Black, the authorities have generously allowed about a third of the proper pavement, for us peasants who have to go about on foot.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“I would suggest one, or more, of the following measures, to mitigate the obvious dangers to life, the bureaucratic removal of this right of way has caused:

The West Bar development taking shapeThe West Bar development taking shape
The West Bar development taking shape

* A temporary reduction in the permitted speed of motorised traffic towards West Bar;

* Temporary closure of the nearside traffic lane;

* The temporary supply of interlinking metal safety barriers.

“I would suggest that Bowmer Kirkland is well-financed, if it is building a high-rise, and ought to be approached to contribute to any costs the above safety measures might entail.

“Finally, doesn’t the city council have a say any more in the decision making for important pavement closures like this?”

Simon Rawlins

Foxhill, Sheffield, S6

Related topics:

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.