No 'blanket restriction' on journalists in Sir Cliff's privacy fight with BBC over South Yorkshire Police raid
Editors said Mr Justice Mann's ruling had "worrying consequences" for press freedom and his decision would make it harder for journalists to scrutinise police.
Sir Cliff, aged 77, had sued over BBC coverage of a South Yorkshire Police raid on his home in Sunningdale, Berkshire, in August 2014, following a child sex assault allegation.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe judge had heard that, in late 2013, a man made an allegation to the Metropolitan Police, saying he had been sexually assaulted by Sir Cliff during an event featuring evangelist Billy Graham at Sheffield United's Bramall Lane football stadium in 1985, when he was a child.
Metropolitan Police officers passed the allegation to South Yorkshire Police in July 2014.
Earlier this month Mr Justice Mann ruled in Sir Cliff's favour following a High Court trial in London, concluding that coverage was a "very serious" privacy invasion and awarded the singer £210,000 damages.
However, Mr Justice Mann has yet to decide how badly Sir Cliff was left out of pocket as a result of the coverage and the singer is still in line to get more damages.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe BBC has also agreed to pay lawyers' bills run up by Sir Cliff during trial, which are about £850,000 on account.
South Yorkshire Police earlier agreed a £400,000 settlement with the singer.
Mr Justice Mann raised concern about the way his ruling had been interpreted when analysing a number of issues at a follow-up High Court hearing yesterday.
He complained about "erroneous reading" of his ruling and added: "It is simply wrong to suggest there is now some blanket restriction on reporting investigations."
BBC bosses said they are considering an appeal but Mr Justice Mann refused to give permission.
However the broadcaster could make a separate application to a Court of Appeal judge.